Abstract
The mainstream literature sees participation as critical to deepening democracy and solving complex environmental issues. An explosion of literature on public participation has occurred since Arnstein's ladder of participation in (1969). However, the literature does not address the conditions under which participation is likely to work and what it can achieve in different circumstances. In order to address these questions, this paper reviews the literature on participation, learning, trust, governance and management and conceptualizes the analysis through developing the split ladder of participation. It creates four ideal typical circumstances and explains what the nature and goal of stakeholder participation is for each circumstance. This model is then tested in four case studies in Mendoza, Argentina, Coquimbo, Chile, and Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada. This split ladder is presented as both a diagnostic and evaluation tool and is supported through the use of examples.
Suggested citation
Hurlbert. M and Gupta. J, 2015, The split ladder of participation: A diagnostic, strategic, and evaluation tool to assess when participation is necessary, Environmental Science & Policy (50), pp. 100-113.
Trending Discussions
From around the site...
Webinar: Engaging with academic and research institutions to close local adaptation knowledge gaps in the Asia-Pacific region
“The Asia Pacific Network (APAN) will host a webinar on ‘Engaging with academic and research institutions to close local...”
Date Announced: CBA16 2022
“The CBA16 planning team is pleased to announce that CBA16 will take place on 3 – 4 October 2022 . CBA16 is a conference...”
Net Zero: Heritage for Climate Action - Call for Proposals
“If you are an organization, looking to capture the potential of culture and heritage to reduce greenhouse gas emissions...”