Abstract
The mainstream literature sees participation as critical to deepening democracy and solving complex environmental issues. An explosion of literature on public participation has occurred since Arnstein's ladder of participation in (1969). However, the literature does not address the conditions under which participation is likely to work and what it can achieve in different circumstances. In order to address these questions, this paper reviews the literature on participation, learning, trust, governance and management and conceptualizes the analysis through developing the split ladder of participation. It creates four ideal typical circumstances and explains what the nature and goal of stakeholder participation is for each circumstance. This model is then tested in four case studies in Mendoza, Argentina, Coquimbo, Chile, and Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada. This split ladder is presented as both a diagnostic and evaluation tool and is supported through the use of examples.
Suggested citation
Hurlbert. M and Gupta. J, 2015, The split ladder of participation: A diagnostic, strategic, and evaluation tool to assess when participation is necessary, Environmental Science & Policy (50), pp. 100-113.
Trending Discussions
From around the site...
A@A Knowledge Network meeting #2
“Want to connect with and learn from others working on climate change adaptation in mountain regions? Join the...”
VCA information session: Multilateral Development Bank (MDB) Reform
“Join us for this information session hosted by the Voices for Just Climate Action Programme! When? 17th August 13:00 (...”
Are you working on adaptation in a specific city?
“Do you want to contribute to redefining the concept of adaptation? Get involved! By gathering expert and local views,...”