Abstract
The mainstream literature sees participation as critical to deepening democracy and solving complex environmental issues. An explosion of literature on public participation has occurred since Arnstein's ladder of participation in (1969). However, the literature does not address the conditions under which participation is likely to work and what it can achieve in different circumstances. In order to address these questions, this paper reviews the literature on participation, learning, trust, governance and management and conceptualizes the analysis through developing the split ladder of participation. It creates four ideal typical circumstances and explains what the nature and goal of stakeholder participation is for each circumstance. This model is then tested in four case studies in Mendoza, Argentina, Coquimbo, Chile, and Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada. This split ladder is presented as both a diagnostic and evaluation tool and is supported through the use of examples.
Suggested citation
Hurlbert. M and Gupta. J, 2015, The split ladder of participation: A diagnostic, strategic, and evaluation tool to assess when participation is necessary, Environmental Science & Policy (50), pp. 100-113.
Trending Discussions
From around the site...
“To avoid harmful effects of climate change we also have to adapt better agricultural practices . And improve our...”
“This is an excellent topic at this moment as climate action is at is very best.”
Webinar | Nature-Based Solutions as a Catalyst for Achieving Mutual Benefits for People, Nature, and Climate (20 January 2021)
“Dear colleagues , The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and the China Council for...”