Budgeting for NDC action – Initial lessons from climate-vulnerable countries

Published: 16th October 2017 11:34Last Updated: 16th October 2017 11:34
SHANGHAI HONGQIAO SOLAR ROOF INSTALLATION, The Climate Group/Flickr (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Installation of solar photovoltaic panels on the roofs of the Hongqiao Passenger Rail Terminal in Shanghai, China. There are a total of 23000 solar panels planned for the CECIC-funded project, each panel with a production capacity of 280 KWh to feed into the electricity grid. Photo by Jiri Rezac. © Jiri Rezac 2010

Introduction

This working paper addresses the following question: are climate change-related expenditures starting to appear in national budgets to secure the early implementation of countries’ Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)? It examines the evidence of resourcing NDC policies and actions in four sub-Saharan African countries – Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya and Uganda – that are known to be vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. These are all non-Annex I Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which include groups of developing countries that are recognized by the Convention as being especially vulnerable to the adverse impacts of climate change.

Given the inherent synergies between adaptation and other development goals, NDC implementation can contribute to nearly all of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially those on health and well-being (SDG 3), clean water and sanitation (SDG 6), ecosystems and biodiversity (SDG 15), and climate action (SDG 13). The UNFCCC’s National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process provides a country-driven, comprehensive approach to adaptation planning and implementation. This is an appropriate process for achieving the adaptation goals contained in countries’ NDCs.

If a country’s NDC sets out what adaptation outcomes it is aiming for, then the National Adaptation Plan process details how to achieve these through the iterative planning, mainstreaming and stakeholder engagement processes required for effective adaptation. 

Summary

The paper first examines the level of spending that passes through the countries’ national budgets for those ministries that play a leadership role in the sectors considered strategic to implementing the NDCs. Significant discrepancies exist between these ministry budget estimates and actual spending in the countries reviewed, raising questions over the potential for speedy implementation of new and additional climate change-related programmes.

How the national budget is constructed has a major bearing on the extent to which NDC-related actions can be identified as part of government spending. Budgetary reform in all four countries, including the recent introduction of programme-based budgeting, has raised the possibility of identifying such expenditures more readily than was previously possible.

A review of national budget spending in Ghana, Kenya and Uganda suggests limited resources are being allocated to NDC-related actions. In addition, many relevant national projects are heavily dependent on donor support. The implication of this is that the early implementation of NDCs in these climate-vulnerable countries will rely on significant international financial support, something already highlighted in the framing of the conditional elements of these countries’ NDCs.

Overall, the present and projected levels of public expenditure suggest that achieving the levels of spending implied in the first NDCs will be very challenging.

Policy recommendations

  1. Actions by a small number of ministries can advance NDC implementation in the four countries reviewed. Where this is the case, efforts to strengthen these ministries’ budget planning and reporting systems should be considered an integral part of early NDC implementation.
  2. For monitoring and reporting purposes, greater prominence should be given to end-of-year actual expenditure reports than start-of-year budget estimates. There is a need to better understand the national budget system through which public funds flow in support of NDC implementation, particularly with regard to the widespread discrepancy between budget projections and actual spending.
  3. Other non-Annex I countries should consider developing national climate change budgets, following the experience of the Governments of Ghana and Kenya, to help identify where relevant NDC spending is taking place and where strategic gaps in spending remain.
  4. The national budget could be used as a tool to assist international reporting to the UNFCCC. The scope for national budgetary systems to provide information on international support received should be considered as part of the ongoing discussions over the enhanced transparency framework of the Paris Agreement.

10 years of weADAPTweADAPT has been sharing knowledge on climate adaptation for the last 10 years.

Thanks for being part of the community! We're constantly trying to improve this platform and we'd be really grateful if you could take a minute to let us know your opinion.

Have your say