Summary
Determining the amount of climate finance received by each developing country is a surprisingly difficult task. The Biennial Update Reports (BURs), submitted every two years by non-Annex I countries, are intended to provide information on this topic. This research suggests that many countries have not submitted their BURs, not complied with UNFCCC reporting requirements, or have used vastly different reporting approaches, making comparisons extremely difficult, if not impossible.
This brief is the fourth in a series summarizing research carried out for the 2017 AdaptationWatch Report. It presents recent work by Romain Weikmans from the Université libre de Bruxelles, and calls for improved reporting guidelines for climate finance information and support for developing countries to aid with UNFCCC reporting requirements.
The policy pointers from the report are provided below. Download the full text from the right-hand column for more detail.
Different Reporting Approaches to Climate Finance Information
Non-Annex I countries take a variety of approaches to reporting climate finance information in their Biennial Update Reports (as shown in the table below, taken from page 2 of the briefing). Some countries choose to report finance recieived on a by-project basis, while others report by donor contry or thematic area. In terms of allocation channels, information is included about bilateral and mutlilateral sources with varying degrees of specificity; this is is an especially complex issue for multilateral finance, which may flow through climate-specific funds, funds under the guidance of the UNFCCC, or multilateral development banks. Sectoral information and information about the financial instrument used is also sometimes provided.
Committee on Finance 2016 Biennial Assessment and Overview of Climate Finance Flows Report. Pp. 32-
33, 103-105. Note: Twelve BURs with technical Reports are not included, as not enough quantitative
information was provided to be adequately compared.
Policy Pointers
- There is a need to understand why many non-Annex I countries have not submitted or not complied with requirements for the Biennial Update Reports. Support should be provided to identify issues and assist with this process.
- Common reporting approaches must be adopted that include guidelines for information reporting categories, as well as underlying definitions, methodologies, and assumptions. The UNFCCC should work closely with non-Annex I countries to develop suitable guidelines that are within the capacities of the various Parties.
Further resources
- Go to AdaptationWatch.org
- View AdaptationWatch's publications
- Read AdaptationWatch's 2016 Adaptation Finance Transparency Gap Report
-
Author
Romain Weikmans, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Suggested Citation
Weikmans, R. (2017). Climate Finance Received - An Analysis of Biennial Update Reports. AdaptationWatch Weekly Briefing.
Read other articles in the series:
- Toward climate finance reporting systems in Latin America
- Capacity building for climate change: Lessons from other regimes
- Financing from the Ground Up: Experiences in Adaptation Finance from Southeast Asia
- Adaptation Governance and Green Climate Fund Readiness in Latin America and the Caribbean
- Can the Least Developed Countries Count on the Green Climate Fund?
Trending Discussions
From around the site...
“Hi Marco, Thanks for expressing an interest in this event! Unfortunately, given the interactive format of the fair (...”
MAIA survey on webinars, special edition publications and video recordings
“When an EC-funded R&D project comes to an end, often the visibility of its findings diminishes meaningfully,...”
“Canada wants to be in it too! Precisely this kind of forum is what I was looking for! Let me explain, because for us...”